![]() |
Colorado Coalition Formed to Fight Proposed Auto Insurance BillCurrent Language Excludes Massage as Personal Injury Protection BenefitBy Editorial Staff An insurance bill introduced in the Colorado legislature1 has the state's massage therapy community up in arms, and for good reason: the bill excludes massage as a benefit of motor-vehicle-injury insurance coverage. The bill, HB 1225, was introduced after Colorado Gov. Bill Owens decided sweeping changes were needed in the state's no-fault auto insurance system.22,3The current insurance law, on the books in Colorado since 1974, includes a benefit for "medically reasonable" massage for auto accident-related injuries, but Gov. Owens has said he won't extend the law, which expires July 1. His decision may have been spurred by a 20-percent increase in Colorado premiums in the past year, compared with a 9-percent increase nationwide. As currently written, HB 1225 would establish three types of policy coverage - basic, managed care and direct - but appears to make no mention of massage therapy as a covered personal injury protection (PIP) benefit. Specifically, the bill language allows an insurer to limit coverage "... to only licensed, registered, or certified health care providers." As Colorado currently lacks statewide massage or bodywork licensure, registration or certification, this stipulation means that auto-accident patients must pay out of pocket for massage and bodywork services - a requirement that would undoubtedly limit patient access to the benefits of massage therapy severely. The bill also notes that a "primary care physician may refer only to nurse practitioner, physical therapist or occupational therapist according to treatment protocols given"; again, there is no mention of referral to massage therapists or bodyworkers.
The CCMTB is in the process of drafting an amendment to HB 1225, which will stipulate that medical massage be made available for all levels of care, and as a matter of choice for all Colorado consumers. The coalition also coordinated Massage Therapy Awareness Day at the state capitol on Jan. 20. The event, which received substantial local media coverage, was intended to raise public and legislative awareness of the benefits of massage therapy, and voice opposition to the proposed bill as written.5,6 The coalition's efforts at Massage Therapy Awareness Day, and in the weeks preceding the event, appeared to pay off, at least in the short-term: On Feb. 11, the House Business Affairs and Labor Committee held a hearing in the Supreme Court chambers of the state capitol to discuss issues relating to HB 1225.6,7 Kathryn Stewart, a member of the CCMTB, presented testimony clarifying the coalition's opposition to the bill. Excerpts from Ms. Stewart's testimony follow:
Following the Feb. 11 committee hearing, the bill was "tabled," suggesting it would not proceed to a vote, pending consideration of potential bill text changes. However, on Feb. 13, after the bill was amended to include chiropractic treatment, the committee passed HB 1225 by an 8-5 vote. 7 As we go to press, the bill has moved to the House floor, still lacking specific reference to or inclusion of massage or bodywork as a covered benefit. Massage Today will report on the progress of HB 1225, and the coalition's efforts to change the bill's proposed language, as more details become available. For more information, visit the CCMTB Web site: www.ccmtb.org. References
* Photos courtesy of Joshua Lawton
Page printed from: http://www.massagetoday.com/archives/2003/03/01.html?no_b=true |