![]() |
California Massage Bill Moves Through SenateBy Editorial Staff A bill originally introduced by state Senator John Burton on February 22, 2001 and endorsed by the California Health Freedom Coalition has been passed by the California Senate and is moving through the state Assembly. The bill, SB 577, amends current state legislation that classifies the administration of many alternative health care services (including massage) as a technical violation of the California Medical Practice Act. Specifically, the act states that:"Any person who practices or attempts to practice, or who advertises or holds himself or herself out as practicing, any system or mode of treating the sick or afflicted in this state, or who diagnoses, treats, operates for, or prescribes for any ailment, blemish, deformity, disease, disfigurement, disorder, injury, or other physical or mental condition of any person, without having at the time of so doing a valid, unrevoked, or unsuspended certificate as provided in this chapter, or without being authorized to perform such act pursuant to a certificate obtained in accordance with some other provision of law, is guilty of a misdemeanor." SB 577 proposes an addition to the existing Business and Professions Code:
Supporters of SB 577 say the bill will allow the thousands of massage therapists, naturopaths, homeopaths, herbalists and other unlicensed alternative health practitioners in the state to provide their healing services without the threat of punitive legal action. Opponents claim that bill will enable unqualified or otherwise suspect individuals to operate under the guise of legitimate health care. Although this bill will alleviate concerns for non-physician practitioners, it appears to ignore such issues as entry-level and continued competency of unlicensed practitioners, and scope of practice. It also leaves the public with criminal courts as the only solution to physical, mental or ethical harm and/or professional misconduct. More to come in a future issue of Massage Today.
Page printed from: http://www.massagetoday.com/archives/2002/03/02.html?no_b=true |