resourcesABOUT MT AUTHOR GUIDELINES CLASSIFIEDS EDITORIAL CALENDAR MEDIA GUIDE MASSAGE MART SCHOOLS & EDUCATION FEEDBACK
Synergy Doesn't Happen in Silos: Acupuncture in Hospitals and Other Healthcare Settings
As acupuncture and traditional East Asian medicine continue to intersect and integrate with biomedical approaches, the conversation about integration expands and becomes richer.
Optimism = Compassion = Trust
A randomized clinical trial recently published online in JAMA Oncology examined how patients viewed their doctor based upon how the practitioner presented bad news to the patient.
Applying the Thin Skull Principle
The "thin skull" principle, also known as the "you take your victim as you find them" principle, is a legal principle that can be summed up by the following statement.
The Need for a New Medical Model: A Challenge for Biopsychosocial and Ecopsychologica Medicine
Chinese medicine speaks of alignment between humans, heaven and earth. It is a complex view with a focus upon relationship. These are comprehensive ideas with no specific terms in contemporary medical practice.
A Well-Kept Secret: 5 Element Acupuncture, Part II
Supervising acupuncture interns at a TCM college, it has always struck me how funny it is to hear the clinic manager tell the patients that the Five Element clinic specializes in treating emotions, as if patients with physical pain have no emotions!
Low Back Pain in Professional Golf: A Common Muscular Relationship
Every sport creates its own unique demands on the body. Some sports require such a myriad of body positions that assessing pathology is often difficult and unpredictable.
An Excerpt from TCM Case Studies: Pediatrics
This excerpt is reprinted with permission from Jamie Wu. TCM Case Studies: Pediatrics was released in 2014 by People's Medical Publishing House.
A View From the ER
The University of Western States has inked an innovative agreement with local nonprofit health system Legacy Health whereby UWS sports-medicine fellows can experience observational clinical rotations in emergency-room settings within the Legacy system.
Term Limits: What's in a Word?
It was the French historian and philosopher Voltaire who once declared the Holy Roman Empire was neither holy nor Roman nor an empire.
Converting More Patients to Your Practice
In 2013 and 2014, the theme was "the money is in the list." This meant that if you had a big email list, you were really making some "cha-ching." Unfortunately, having thousands of emails doesn't equate to thousands of dollars in profit.
Will You Be an Amplifer or a Mute?
These times are changing, and changing quickly. There have been many challenges to this profession throughout the past few years. The challenge is to talk, then talk and talk some more about this medicine.
There Really is No Room for Sexism
Recently, Matteo* (a transgender male) approached me during a break in an advanced shiatsu class in Berlin where he was one of two men in a group of 20 women. "Pamela. Don't forget to remind the translator to include male endings."
The Dietary Supplement Research Dilemma
I do not care what the truth is, one way or another; I just want to know it. And when it comes to dietary supplements, the truth can be hard to find for a number of reasons.
Functional Hip Impingement (Part 1)
Every time I sit down to write an article, I realize how much more there is to know about musculoskeletal pain. I also learn something new every time. (I want to give special thanks to Lucy Whyte Ferguson for assisting with this article.)
Talking to Patients About Lumbar Facet Denervation (Medial Branch Neurotomy)
Lumbar facet denervation, more appropriately termed medial branch neurotomy (MBN), is a procedure that may be considered when patients suffer from recalcitrant non-radicular axial back and/or leg pain.
Sleep, Less Sleep or No Sleep?
I had a dream I wasn't getting enough sleep. It was a very realistic dream, even though I was probably slightly awake and not really deep dreaming. Most likely I had been dozing, caught in that twilight of sleep and wakefulness.
Recreational Cannabis Use and TCM
Many people are drawn to cannabis for its effects physically, mentally and emotionally. Medically, cannabis has some legitimate uses, however the scope of this article is limited to the recreational use of cannabis.
Turning a Blind Eye to History – and Reality
The American Medical Association is taking the Supreme Court's Feb. 25, 2015 decision exactly as it always does – by turning a blind eye to history, legal precedent and reality.
TCM Congress in Rothenburg is Largest in Western World
In the medieval town of Rothenburg, deep set within the Bavarian countryside in Southern Germany, the TCM Kongress Rothenburg each year draws around 1.200 participants from more than 40 different countries to attend the biggest TCM conference in the Western world.
The Way We Are Designed: A Conversation with Gil Hedley, PhD
I was first introduced to the work of Gil Hedley by Tom DiFerdinando. He gifted me Gil's DVD series.
A House Divided?
The American Chiropractic Association's House of Delegates voted on 30 resolutions at its annual business meeting in Washington D.C., but two in particular took immediate center stage due to their controversial nature.
July, 2004, Vol. 04, Issue 07
We Get Letters & E-Mail
By Editorial Staff
The following letters were not published in the printed edition of Massage Today. E-mail your comments to . Some letters have been edited for clarity.
In this segment:
Letters regarding Ralph Stephens' March article, "A Trade or Profession?" (www.massagetoday.com/archives/2004/03/11.html).
Letters regarding Cliff Korn's March editorial, "The Evils of Money," (www.massagetoday.com/archives/2004/03/09.html).
Letters regarding Cliff Korn's April editorial, "Of Foxes and Henhouses," (www.massagetoday.com/archives/2004/04/11.html)
"Ralph Stephens' rants are thought-provoking"
I have to admit that Ralph Stephens' rants are thought-provoking, and this installment in the March issue is no exception.In my experience, massage is neither a trade nor a profession, but rather a vocation -- literally, a calling or even a spiritual calling. Caring human touch is the basis of massage, and is the energy that facilitates healing in all modalities. Without it, massage is just physical therapy.
The proliferation of mediocre schools is not what makes mediocre therapists, as Mr. Stephens asserts. This is a symptom, not the cause. The cause is mediocre students. (No, I don't teach massage nor run a school.) Cartoonist Gary Larson caught the essence of the problem in his cartoon strip, "The Far Side," when he showed Captain Hook in a job counseling office trying to decide whether to be a pirate or a massage therapist.
The fact is, a good student will become a good therapist even after going to a mediocre school, because he or she will make the extra effort needed. Conversely, you can send mediocre students to the best schools in the world and train them for thousands of hours, and they will still be mediocre therapists. This is true in all fields.
A 1988 Chinese study found that experienced qi gong masters emitted greater than 20 dB (100 times) more infrasonic acoustic energy from their hands than the control group. If this test or one like it could be applied to massage therapists, perhaps we could weed out mediocrity so that Mr. Stephens could sleep at night.
Warren Marsh, NCTMB
I'm a massage therapy student in Ohio, and will graduate around Thanksgiving, sit for the exams, and (as long as I pass) be able to stick those three important letters -- "L" for Licensed, "M" for Massage, and "T" for Therapist -- at the end of my name.
I plan to further my education after graduating by learning and adopting a large number of different modalities to be the best therapist I can. With regards to the whole Trade/Profession argument that's abounding in the massage world (and in particular this publication over the past few issues), I say "Phooey!" Let's look again at the definitions that Ralph R. Stephens gave us:
As far as I see it, we're both. We're skilled practitioners who work on the body for a fee (or not if you're so inclined) and require specialized training and education. In most cases, we continue to educate ourselves beyond graduating from school: we attend seminars and workshops; learn special modalities; and work with our peers to train and develop further skills.
Do allopathic doctors graduate into their professional lives without having skills? Would you want a doctor to operate on you with no surgical skills? Do architects graduate without specialized or extensive training? Would you hire an architect to build you a house if he or she didn't how to apply the laws of physics to construction?
The argument for massage to be seen as a profession instead of a trade smacks of elitism and wanting to be elevated to the mythical status that doctors, lawyers and accountants. Vice versa, wanting massage to be seen as a trade smacks of not taking pride in our continuing education, interfacing with all other facets of the medical community and building on the knowledge that already exists.
The "rub" is that educational standards and requirements differ from state to state for massage, and there's no baseline for education. There's no overall organization responsible for overseeing and regulating massage nationally. The current national examination, the NCETMB, is performed online -- theres no practical exam. How on earth, as physical professionals, can we not be tested on our palpation and manipulation skills? Some states regulate massage and provide their own examinations and licensure, while others do not. Some states don't even require a certification, never mind a license.
There needs to be a national licensure organization, just like there is for registered nurses. With a national organization at the helm, establishing a baseline for education, there would be a nationally recognized license that would allow therapists to work easily in different states (as they often find hard to do right now). Massage would also attain a level of acceptability within the medical community that it currently doesn't have; massage therapy can only benefit from such a thing.
In Ohio, massage therapy is a limited branch of medicine and regulated by the State of Ohio Medical Board. I'm proud of that, because massage therapy is perceived to be a healing profession, with regulation comes compliance and protection of the client base. We still suffer by not having practical testing, but I think we're better of than a number of other states.
Jason Paul McCartan
"Cliff Korn's column...opens a needed dialogue"
I just finished reading the March 2004 edition. Congratulations on the success of this magazine. I'm writing because I agree with Cliff Korn that massage therapists are under paid because many of us love what we do and aren't good business people. But, as our profession works diligently to increase the level of public awareness to the benefits of massage therapy it is time our profession stop putting a zero or discounted value on the importance of our work.
For example, in the article "Are You Sitting on a 24-Karat Gold Mine?" (www.massagetoday.com/archives/2004/03/07.html), Colleen (Steigerwald) Holloway's ideas for increasing business is to discount a massage by 50 percent or offer two massages for the price of one. I have yet to see any other profession offer suggestions such as this, unless they are selling a commodity that is overstocked. In the world of business it is important to know your target market. If massage therapists wants to increase their businesses, they should be more proactive. But, that doesn't mean selling services at a discount. There are plenty of other things that therapists can do to keep clients, such as sending birthday cards or reminder notices. As our profession becomes more aligned with the health care field, articles on how to run a successful health care practice would be appreciated.
Linda DeGray, MA, LMT
I have converted to the electronic form of Massage Today and it works great for me; the reminder in my e-mail box prompts me to read it. My only complaint is the same one I have about the paper issues: I mean to read just a couple of columns and wind up perusing the whole thing!
As always, Cliff Korn's [March 2004] column makes great sense and opens a needed dialogue. When I began massage practicing therapy in the 1970s there was a prevalence of the attitude "a massage should be as free as a hug," and for many, that outlook still has unwarranted resonance. The psychological makeup of caregivers and the prevailing attitude in the marketplace combine to create treacherous territory. Some massage consumers consciously or unconsciously expect that the therapist who enables their wellness should enable non-massage benefits as well. Although I do not practice anymore, I have acute memories of frequently hearing, "You have such a gift!" and having to ready myself to deflect attempts to receive my "gift" gratis.
I developed this rationale: My time and good name are all I truly have in life. I will give away some of the treasure of my time by doing massage, but it will be in exchange for someone else's treasure (of money or services), and will be done in a way that enhances my good name. I still donated my time to charitable enterprises and felt that was a way of adding to my good name.
Most schools are run by massage therapists who struggle with business concepts and applications. Just as one school in my old neighborhood had an entirely inadequate and absurd class in ethics ("Don't have sex with clients" and "Never break contact with your client's skin during a session"), some schools minimize or skip the very important topic of how massage works in the real-world marketplace
I hope your call for better a business foundation in massage schools brings about therapists who are better equipped to run their businesses.
P.S.- Regarding another issue you mentioned in your column: Do you remember Andrew Weil's address to the AMTA National Convention in New Orleans back in the 90s? He said that as he left Alaska to fly to Louisiana, people there were envious of his opportunity to be among hundreds of massage therapists. On the airplane he contemplated the shift of public attitude toward the profession. At the New Orleans airport he got into a taxi and when the driver asked what he was doing in New Orleans he said he was there to give an address to a meeting of the American Massage Therapy Association.
"Massage, huh?" the cabby said. "I bet you get lucky a lot."
Regarding Cliff Korn's March 2004 editorial, I definitely agree that massage therapists need to evaluate their fees based on their levels of expertise and their local market; however, I disagree with the insinuation that a massage therapist should charge more when "more advanced skills" are necessary to provide massage to his or her clients.
My physician does not charge more to bring all his knowledge to bear in diagnosing and treating patients, nor does my chiropractor charge more for a difficult adjustment. I passionately believe that my clients come to me for all my expertise, and to charge more or less for certain techniques would violate my code of ethics. That may be part of the reason I have never had to advertise, why many of my clients have been with me for over a decade, and why my appointment book is as full as I want it to be. I also believe that a "relaxation" massage, in many instances, is as therapeutic as a massage labeled as "therapeutic." The wise therapist is the one who recognizes and honors the value of both.
Paula Z. Hamelik, LMT
I have over 15-plus years in this business and can relate to this article. It was not long ago when folks said, "customer service in the health care field" when asked what I did for a living. NOT FOR FREE is what I take serious issue with in this article! I value myself as an incredible human with an ability to effect lives and not a work drone in a mundane field of body "fluffing." I disagree that most massage therapists/bodyworkers devalue themselves or are afraid of money or even success. Extreme cases are in all professions; for the purposes of this letter, set those aside.
In my experience it's those clients/patients that need us the very most that canot afford it. If payment had been demanded for all of our services and I taught my students to demand payment, that would be wrong! Yet, I would be monetarily thousands of dollars richer in cash. Yet, at what ultimate price would I have had to pay for such?
This is a healing-art profession; we are neither hairdressers nor car mechanics -- both wonderful fields, yet not the same. We are the tools that enable others to "heal" themselves in a triad of ways: body, spirit, mind. It is my divine gift to be able to work in this field. The inability to "share" or "give" free touch is more of an issue than the worthiness of the receipt of payment for it.
I have worked and felt, at times, like I had lost my ethical soul in several extremely high-end Houston "conveyor belt" spas, that charge clients an hourly rate for 50 to 55 minutes, give them some herbal tea and a promise for a brighter day. Really, the most ethical thing to do is to assist clients in a longer session that tackles the problem; explain the reasons for them to be aware of how to modify their actions/behavior to enhance each day of their life; or, in many cases, refer them to a specialist, such as a chiropractor or medical doctor -- not focus on "washing instructions for that fancy terry robe" that came with their spa visit or sell them some "magic cream" to make it all go away till next time; moreover, in my experience it's the "spa employers" that treat each therapist like a lower-class citizen and not appreciate the "gift" they have as a part of their intuition. That really knocks down even the healthiest spirit of a therapist.
Do not get me wrong, my hourly rates are higher than the average massage therapist, and justly so, due to my years of experience and education. As the sole-proprietor of my business, every day is a profit or loss. Just put it into perrspective of life: every moment is priceless; use each one for the "higher good," and abundance is yours! I practice bodywork to create such happiness and peace for others in our world.
What do we receive in compensation for these "freebies?" It's called "Karma," and each day it comes back to me, so make a mental note in your check register. Each day of my life, I am thankful and privileged to "touch others" for my bounty of health, family and prosperity.
I will never regret my "free" hours of "touching the lives" of the terminally ill hospital patients and families, AIDS clients, breast cancer survivors, war veterans, nursing home residents, newborn babies or burned children, animals and laid-off Enron employees. These bodies riddled with disease, disfigured through physical or emotional trauma and tortured by neglect are the most valuable of my clients.
Most importantly, it is a privilege to be there for them, and I never, never told a soul or promoted these "good deeds" for monetary gain from them or other clients. It is my gift to receive them into my life as a reminder of my own abundance in all aspects.
So who is receiving more? Think on that. I am thankful that my check register is filled with notes in black ink and sometime numbers in red. It's not the measure of the bottom line...behold the "Brass ring" that I hold.
Sheri Wood-Rogers RMT, MTI
More From the North Carolina Board of Massage and Bodywork Therapy
The following letter is in response to Cliff Korn's April 2004 editorial concerning rule changes to the massage licensing law in North Carolina (www.massagetoday.com/archives/2004/04/11.html).
Read a letter from the North Carolina Board of Massage and Bodywork Therapy's legal counsel in the June 2004 issue at www.massagetoday.com/archives/2004/06/12.html, and Mr. Korn's comments regarding the letter in his June 2004 editorial at www.massagetoday.com/archives/2004/06/09.html.
As the former Vice-Chair of the North Carolina Board of Massage and Bodywork Therapy (Board) and former chair of the board's School Approval Committee, I am responding to your editorial in the April issue of Massage Today. From my perspective, the article is inflammatory, inaccurate, and poorly researched. That you would receive information from an "individual" who suggested you "take a peek at the rules" and then choose to publish an article without bothering to confirm or verify facts demonstrates irresponsible journalism. I question what agenda and whose agenda you are attempting to convey to your readers.
First, let me state that I am not a current recipient of your publication. I was given the article when I attended the Spring conference of the North Carolina Chapter of AMTA (AMTA-NC) held recently in New Bern on March 26-28. Copies of your editorial along with copies of the draft of proposed rule changes by the board were provided to the chapter membership. I was concerned that your editorial comments were presented as factual, along with comments by the leadership of this organization, about the negative impact of these rule changes on the practice of massage in the state. Your editorial was touted as proof of this fact.
This was the first time I had attended an AMTA-NC conference. As the program director for the Therapeutic Massage Program at Pitt Community College in Greenville, NC, I had taken a group of my students to the conference as a way to introduce them to a "professional organization." Imagine the surprise of new students to see an article on the North Carolina Board of Massage and Bodywork Therapy presented in such a negative light, especially when their instructor was a former member. They were confused about what to think. It left them with negative impressions of the North Carolina board, before they had any experience with this regulatory agency.
I would agree with your statement in paragraph 4, of your editorial: you did provide a "brief analysis." I would also add from my opinion it was inadequate. For your information, North Carolina is the only state with massage regulations that do not have another state governmental agency administering some part of the licensing process for schools of massage and bodywork therapy. This responsibility used to be the domain of the North Carolina Department of Community Colleges (NCCCS).
When the North Carolina Massage and Bodywork Practice Act (our massage law) was written, it was assumed by the authors that the NCCCS would continue the licensing of massage and bodywork schools and the massage board would approve school curricula and instructional staff. After the Practice Act was passed, and the board was appointed, it was discovered that, due to state regulations, the NCCCS no longer had the statutory authority to license massage and bodywork therapy schools.
For the board, this meant it had to bear the full responsibility for creating and administering a comprehensive school approval process. As a former member of this agency, I can attest to the fact that the board had never imagined that it would be forced into the regulation arena without adequate funding or staff to administer such a program. As you may know, approving a school on paper is not the same as verifying compliance with all standards. As a result of this, the board formed a School Approval Committee, which I chaired.
For your information and enlightenment, there were no "former school owners" on this committee. Besides myself, the committee was made up of the board's public member (an attorney who is the current board chair, and who has taught in the state university system), and another therapist member of the board with years of practical and teaching experience. We all have advanced degrees. As a foundation for our research, we examined educational standards from the NCCCS, Commission on Massage Therapy Accreditation (COMTA), and the Accrediting Council for Continuing Education and Training (ACCET), as well as other state regulations. At that time I was maintaining my own private practice. I cannot speak for the other members of my committee, but I spent countless hours researching these processes and during that time reduced my practice to four days per week so that I could provide a service to my profession and contribute to the professionalism in the field.
Furthermore to insinuate that a "proprietary school owner" spearheaded the increase in school fees to drive small schools and the community colleges out of the massage education business is just plain irresponsible and complete nonsense. The fees that the board has collected to administer the program are about 25 percent of the actual costs. Without funding from the legislature, (which is precluded under our Practice Act) or another agency to administer the licensing process, the funding would have to come from the regulated group: the schools themselves.
There are several other issues in your article that I would like to address:
Candace C. Frye, MA, LMBT
Join the conversation
Comments are encouraged, but you must follow our User Agreementcomments powered by Disqus
Keep it civil and stay on topic. No profanity, vulgar, racist or hateful comments or personal attacks. Anyone who chooses to exercise poor judgement will be blocked. By posting your comment, you agree to allow MPA Media the right to republish your name and comment in additional MPA Media publications without any notification or payment.