resourcesABOUT MT AUTHOR GUIDELINES CLASSIFIEDS EDITORIAL CALENDAR MEDIA GUIDE MASSAGE MART SCHOOLS & EDUCATION FEEDBACK
By the Numbers: 3 Common Financial Mistakes With Major Consequences
Warren Buffett is on record for sharing the hidden art of becoming wealthy and making it simple enough for anyone to grasp.
Looking For Answers In Many Places
I am sure we have all heard the old adage: "When the only tool in your toolbox is a hammer, everything starts to look like a nail."
Spotlight on Acupuncture Research at IRCIMH
Acupuncture and Traditional Chinese Medicine were well-represented at the International Research Congress on Integrative Medicine and Health (IRCIMH)- 2014 which took place in Miami from May 13–16.
Vaccines and Chiropractic: Evidence-Based Medicine or Medical Dogma?
Right or wrong, the chiropractic profession has historically been against vaccinations. However, a growing trend within the profession is seeking to reverse this position.
Hazards in the Environment Making Your Patients Sick
Working both separately and together, Western and Chinese medicine have many successes in the treatment of the myriad diseases that afflict human beings in modern times.
Inside Liver Failure, Cirrhosis and Cancer
The Liver belongs to Wood in Five Element Theory and is in charge of Dispersing and Expanding which means all the processing and detoxifying of harmful substances such as medications and chemicals require the efforts of the Liver.
Physical Exam 101: The Hands
I am sure you are familiar with the old adage: "When the only tool in your toolbox is a hammer, everything starts to look like a nail."
The Acupuncture Success Express
Time is passing very quickly these days. We are atoms half the way through the year of the horse. You could call it "horse racing season" for this profession. Perhaps it is time for reinvention during this time.
Are You a Bad Chiropractic Patient?
My father was a great DC. In fact, as you might expect, he was the doctor of chiropractic I measured all other doctors against. Sadly, he died at age 61 when I was in my early 30s.
Curbing Label Overwhelm
For the average consumer, reading a food package can be overwhelming: natural, organic, non-GMO, gluten free, free range ... you get the picture.
Deciphering The New CMS 1500 Claim Form
Q: I am confused on using the new 1500 form, particularly Block 14 and Block 15. What is required and how do I properly fill these out? And do I actually have to use this new form or may I continue using the old version?
Coding for the Subluxation: ICD-9 vs. ICD-10
When I attended chiropractic school, I was taught that chiropractors approach health care differently than the traditional medical establishment.
Remembering Clarence Gonstead and 50 Years of the Gonstead Clinic
Dr. Clarence Selmer Gonstead (1898-1978) took chiropractic practice from back-alley bone setting to an understandable biomechanical science. His life was dedicated to clinical competency.
The Kidney Official
The Kidney is known as the Official Who Controls the Waterways. In Western medical terms, a major function of the Kidneys is to filter the blood. Every day, a person's kidneys process about 200 liters of blood to sift out about two liters of waste and excess water.
Healing With Hope
Ella is a Gulf War veteran and a survivor of military sexual trauma. Like hundreds of veterans, Ella was on 11 different medications for depression, anxiety, insomnia, irritable bowel syndrome and chronic pain.
Fibromyalgia: Put the Pain in Its Place
While some fibromyalgia patients respond favorably to regular chiropractic care, others experience minimal relief. Unfortunately, many of these patients must rely on pharmacological management to relieve their constant pain.
Immunizations by Colorado DCs: Really?
You probably didn't hear about it, but back on Nov. 21, 2013, the Board of Directors of the Colorado Chiropractic Association (CCA) adopted "immunization authority" for Colorado DCs as its No. 2 legislative goal.
Medical Qigong for the Heart: Part II
Chinese Medicine is rich in commentary regarding the emotions and how they affect our qi.
Knee Pain From the Kinetic Chain
As practitioners of manual medicine, chiropractors often treat patients suffering from knee pain.
Why You Should Include the Single-Leg Stance Test in Every Patient Assessment
The single-leg stance (SLS) test, also known as the single-limb stance test, unipedal stance test or one-legged stance / balance test, is often used in the geriatric population to assess static postural and balance control.
Best Practices for Website Success
If one asked 10 years ago whether a website was relevant I was the first to suggest no. Yet as the world moves increasingly towards electronic information there is a dire need to have a website for your practice. Your website is actually your electronic calling card.
February, 2001, Vol. 01, Issue 02
Will Research Prove Our Point?
By Ralph Stephens, BS, LMT, NCTMB
There is a belief in the massage profession that research is needed to validate massage and gain acceptance from the medical industry. Some feel the public will participate in greater numbers if research "proves" the efficacy of massage.These are false assumptions. The number of people paying for massage out of their own pockets has doubled in the last three years (from 8% to 16% of the population), proving that massage works.
Research is a business. Thousands of people make their living doing research. To expand their business, they have promoted the notion that nothing is valid until it is proven with a double-blind study. This is a lie, but it has become accepted as truth. The truth is, double-blind studies are a mechanism to restrict entry into the marketplace. One of the primary places the double-blind research industry has established itself firmly is in the field of human health. This is unfortunate for both humans and health.
The medical/pharmaceutical industry, the third leading cause of death in the U.S., uses double-blind research to control the marketing of products and procedures. According to their agents, nothing is valid without a double-blind study. If something goes wrong, they say, "We did a study that shows this is OK." If some "new" product, like an herb, or a procedure, like massage, is offered to the public, they will attack it and attempt to suppress it by saying, "There is no valid research to prove this." It doesn't matter that the herb has been used for hundreds of years with consistent success. It is irrelevant that massage has been a predominant health care system for thousands of years.
If enough research is done to prove massage is valid, massage will be accepted at last. Maybe those gleaming insurance dollars will come to therapists who are drooling over them. Sorry, you do not understand research.
You can prove almost anything with a double-blind study. Studies can be created to prove almost anything causes cancer. Alter the diet of the subjects, put them in the right environment - and presto - whatever is being tested causes cancer, especially in rats. It can be proven that virtually everyone who has gotten cancer has eaten lettuce sometime in their lives!
Invalid research? No. Under a certain set of circumstances, a certain thing being tested can cause a certain result. Unfortunately, we are seldom told all the circumstances. We are just told the desired outcome.
"Oat bran doesn't lower cholesterol." We were not told that the test subjects had normal cholesterol levels and high blood pressure in that study. Of course oat bran didn't lower cholesterol in people with normal levels. This study was used to counteract the study that proved oat bran did lower cholesterol, in people with high cholesterol and high blood pressure. Confused? Good, that's the idea. What do confused people do? Nothing. They avoid the cheap, nontoxic nutritional remedy and, in this case, go back on the drugs like good patients.
The research industry keeps itself busy by replicating results. If someone proves something that is not desired, the establishment says, "One study doesn't prove something. You have to wait until others have replicated your results." Now another study must be funded, and another, and another. Then someone else will conduct a study and set it up in such a way to disprove the initial study. Research will never bring about the acceptance of something the establishment doesn't want accepted. Research will always bring about the acceptance of anything the establishment wants accepted (i.e., aspartame.)
Massage is particularly difficult to research. It is difficult to control all the possible variables, and there are many different massage techniques to use. A study was done that supposedly disproved the theory that sports massage reduced lactic acid in athletes after competition. The study was done by a college that has no expertise in massage. There were no sports massage therapists in the area. Who did sports massage on the subjects? That didn't seem to matter. The press ran with it. There are lots of great massage techniques that, even if done by experts, would not reduce lactic acid levels. Further, the appropriate techniques, if done incorrectly, would not work either. Double-blind research may be too blind.
The point here is not to argue against the massage profession supporting research. There is much to be learned by double-blind research. Excellent research is being done by Dr. Tiffany Field (of the Touch Research Institute), among others. Their should be commended and supported. However, we need to remember that if the results become threatening to the medical/pharmaceutical industry, they can and will be easily disproved.
Research may be a huge potential danger to the massage profession. If studies done by well-trained massage therapists indicate benefits from massage, the public will go to therapists expecting to receive those benefits. Unfortunately, there are so many poorly trained therapists out there that most of the public will be disappointed. This has the potential to cause a huge backlash against our profession. If capitalized on by opposing forces, it could set massage back years in efforts to legitimize the profession in the eyes of the public.
Let's not pour every available dollar into research, hoping it will legitimize massage. It won't, in and of itself. What will legitimize the profession is the public receiving consistent, high-quality services from well-trained professionals. We must work to establish more consistent levels of education and expertise at the entry level. Continuing education in advanced levels of massage therapy should be encouraged, if not mandated.
Only when the public can receive similar benefits to those proven in studies will research become an effective marketing tool to the public. It will never be an effective means of gaining acceptance from the medical/pharmaceutical industry. The public has already voted positively on the efficacy of massage. If we as a profession work to meet the public's expectations, we will be unstoppable. If we work to prove ourselves to the sickness industry, it may well be our downfall.
Click here for more information about Ralph Stephens, BS, LMT, NCTMB.
Join the conversation
Comments are encouraged, but you must follow our User Agreementcomments powered by Disqus
Keep it civil and stay on topic. No profanity, vulgar, racist or hateful comments or personal attacks. Anyone who chooses to exercise poor judgement will be blocked. By posting your comment, you agree to allow MPA Media the right to republish your name and comment in additional MPA Media publications without any notification or payment.