Massage Today
Massage Today dotted line
dotted line

dotted line

Poll Results for the following Question:

Should massage schools begin limiting the number of enrollees?

Results:

Yes
64.9%
No
35.1%

Total Respondents: 231

Comments:

Note: These comments are reproduced as written by visitors to this Web site.
They have not been edited for content, grammar, or spelling.



Yes In my view if overcrowding conditions exist and in some schools it is possible, then yes, this not impacts the students learning capacity, it also attracts administration issues and frustration of tutors.

Anonymous
No If you think that there is an evaluation process which can accurately predict who will or will not
end up being a skilled and caring massage therapist,
good luck. Give the consumer some credit. Their
bodies and minds will be able to tell the difference between a compassionate healer and a "go through the
motions" practitioner, and like everything else,
the individual must choose to give their business
to those who they feel are true therapists.
Otherwise, another freedom of Americans is down the
drain. Consider that their are practicing Medical
Doctors our there who could care less about their
patients, and give only the slightest caring or skill
to people. This is bad healing, event though these
people obviously met the criteria required to attend
Med. school. Each of us must trust our own percep-
tions, and if we feel the treatment we are receiving
is not up to par, then we must search out better care.
We should not, however, take away the freedom of people to receive training of their choice. If there are individuals who have gone through training and
certification, and yet cannot make it in the business world, then so be it - their willingness to try should not be taken away from them. Restrict the
opportunity of people to learn a healing art??
Don't get it.
Anonymous
 It is my belief that massage schools set appropriate criteria for the selection of students. The criteria should parrell the intentions of the school and what their priorities. I realize that schools need to make money; but in my opinion just because you can afford it does not necessairly mean you have the inner makings of a compassionate massage therapist.


Yes Yes, lets limit the number of enrollees. We probably should do so, but I doubt it will happen. We are major massage school with an excellent national reputation, and definitely feel the pressure of the 1000 massage schools that are out there now.

Anonymous
Yes 
Yes most other health professions have limited enrollment and specific qualifications to get in. It keeps the market regulated. There should be specific qualifications for entry into the massage market It will also limit how many schools can sprout up.
Anonymous
Yes Wouldn't it be great if we could all find the best vocation we are suited to, instead of looking for a quick buck the easy way? before we end up working with peoples bare essentials! Course information sessions are invaluable for this and they also give the potential student enough information to decide if this is the job for them, if the institution is a good one.


No I am not in favor (at this time) of limiting schools and/or students. HOWEVER, schools MUST, and I MEAN MUST, start being truthful regarding opportunity, income, length of average therapist's career, etc., to ALL prospects and students As it stands now, most schools make it look and sound like pie in the sky to become a massage therapist....Nothing could be further from the truth.

I am also not in favor of any form of government regulation on massage therapists other than that of possibly setting a reasonable (not exceeding 500), minimum number of educational hours to use the title certified massage therapist.

Anonymous
No The size of enrollment will not reflect on the quality of education if there is on hands attention to the individual students. This can be accomplished with a school that has a large enrollment by hireing more instructors to handle a larger student body. The excellent schools are the ones that the students flock to, causing greater enrollement. We should not limit the prospective student from going to a school of their choice. The other schools will then be forced to raise the quality of their programs to compete. This along with raising the academic standards for entrance into massage school would raise the quality of the new graduate, thus raising the quality of the profession as a whole.


Yes Yes, I think that there are many areas where schools should arbitrarily limit the number of students they accept. My particular area (Texarkana, AR/TX) is flooded with new massage therapists trying establish a business and they are losing money...and most likely not making any at all. And there is only ONE school here! The criteria for establishing limits on enrollment should be proportional to the number of massage therapists in the city/state and adjacent areas.
Thank you for giving me a chance to explain my vote.
Doe Harden


Yes alot of the people i have come across in the field do not truely enjoy the body and how it works with each individual I feel that these people should not work with the public because those clients will feel the disinterests

Anonymous
Yes Smaller classes provide for a better learning experience. The education the massage student receives is more complete with hands on help and direction from a teacher who is aware of each student and available to give one on one guidance.

Anonymous
No i have been licensed for nearly 10 years, there are enough bodies to go around the last time i checked..and people come and go in this profession....

Anonymous
Yes Class size is an important consideration. A ratio of one instructor to 12 students is appropriate. Any more students and the instructor should have T.A.'s


Yes I believe the number should be limited, but not because of a glut of the market... I truly believe there's plenty of business to go around. Rather because of my fear of classes being too large, and the quality of education suffering adversely. Therapists need to have a decent understanding of they're getting into, when they walk out that door, diploma in hand. so these are my reasons.

Anonymous
No There are many different massage schools with a variety of styles which include class size, philosophy, etc. I graduated from a school which limits class size to 12 people (we had 7 in our class); for me this was the right number of classmates and the ideal teaching envrionment. Others may work better in a more formal environment with a greater number of fellow students. I feel that our choice of learning environments (among properly accredited schools of course) should match our individual learning styles to provide the optimum environment for each of us as individuals.


No The school I graduated from had an average class size of 45 students. While I sometimes heard fellow students speculate that a smaller class would be better, our classroom experience was wonderful. There were 3 instructors in the classroom during any hands-on time, so there was plenty of expertise available when needed. Out of the original 52 students that started, 45 graduated, and 20 students had secured jobs before we even finished the program.

Larger classes can provide more momentum, greater support in the numbers, and more variety of student bodies to work on in the class! I'm glad I had a larger class.

Anonymous
No but to many fly by night want to be vodoo massage tehrapist are screwing up the impression and effectivness of the rest of us.
dotted line